Prom
Backed by
The University of Michigan is exploring potential modifications to its diversity program, which has been a major advocate for diversity, equity, and inclusion in higher education. Critics are raising concerns about the program’s effectiveness and influence on campus culture.
Written by Nicholas Confessore
The University of Michigan, known for advocating diversity, equity, and inclusion in higher education, is considering revising its program in response to potential challenges from the upcoming second term of President Donald J. Trump and Republican opposition to these initiatives in both government and academia.
The university’s regents stated in interviews that they anticipate the board will propose restrictions on diversity statements in the hiring and promotion process. Additionally, they may consider reallocating more of Michigan’s D.E.I. budget towards recruitment initiatives and tuition assistance for students from lower-income backgrounds.
Michigan is considering making changes to prioritize diversity, equity, and inclusion (D.E.I.) within its public university system, which would set it apart from other universities that are typically pressured by legislation to do so. The board overseeing these changes has a majority of Democrats and is elected by state voters, working together to make decisions. The state’s constitution gives these board members control over the university’s finances and overall management.
The next meeting of the regents is scheduled for December 5th. However, conversations between the regents and university officials have stirred up strong opposition on campus in Michigan lately. Administrators in charge of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (D.E.I.) have launched a campaign to defend their work and maintain their funding in response to criticism.
A large group of supporters for diversity, equity, and inclusion (D.E.I.) came together at the Ann Arbor campus on Monday for a rally.
One of the speakers, a junior named Pragya Choudhary, expressed that she believes no one in the audience thinks the D.E.I. initiatives at the university are flawless. However, she emphasized that everyone present understands that without those initiatives, the university would be in a worse state.
The discussions have highlighted a general lack of clarity on campus regarding the purpose of the D.E.I. program and the goals of the regents. Some faculty and students are concerned that the regents may completely cut funding for the school’s D.E.I. initiatives, although this drastic measure is not currently being considered. There are also accusations that the regents are planning to eliminate the school’s Go Blue Guarantee, which covers full tuition for lower-income students from Michigan. However, the regents have actually expressed their intentions to expand the program.
We are experiencing difficulties in accessing the content of the article.
Kindly activate JavaScript in your browser’s settings.
We appreciate your understanding as we confirm access. If you are currently in Reader mode, please log out and sign in to your Times account, or consider subscribing to access all content from The Times.
We appreciate your understanding as we confirm access.
Are you currently a member? Sign in.
Interested in having access to all news articles from The Times? Subscribe
Prom
Index of the Website
Navigation for Site Information