Prom
Backed by
The University of Michigan is evaluating potential changes to its diversity program, which is known for being a strong advocate for diversity, equity, and inclusion (D.E.I.) in higher education. Critics are raising concerns about the effectiveness of the program and its influence on campus dynamics.
Written by Nicholas Confessore
The University of Michigan, known for its strong support of diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives in higher education, is considering making changes to its own program. This decision comes as colleges nationwide prepare for Donald J. Trump’s second presidency and potential challenges to these initiatives from Republicans in government and academia.
Members of the university’s governing body expressed their intention to propose restrictions on the use of diversity statements in the hiring and promotion process. Additionally, they are considering reallocating a portion of the university’s diversity, equity, and inclusion (D.E.I.) budget towards recruitment efforts and financial aid for students from low-income backgrounds.
Michigan is considering changes that would set it apart as one of the first selective public universities to reconsider diversity, equity, and inclusion (D.E.I.) without being forced to do so by legislative pressure. The board, which is elected by state voters and mainly operates by consensus, is currently dominated by Democrats with a 6-2 majority. The state constitution grants regents the final authority over the university’s finances and overall supervision of the institution.
The regents are scheduled to have their next meeting on December 5th. However, conversations between the regents and university officials have caused controversy on Michigan’s campus recently. Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion administrators are working to defend their work and protect their funding from criticism.
A large group of supporters for diversity, equity, and inclusion gathered at the Ann Arbor campus for a rally on Monday.
During a speech at the university, a junior named Pragya Choudhary acknowledged that the D.E.I. initiatives at the university are not flawless, but emphasized that they are necessary to make the university a better place.
The discussions on campus have highlighted a general lack of clarity about the purpose and goals of the D.E.I. program and the intentions of the regents. There are concerns among some faculty and students that the regents may completely cut funding for the school’s D.E.I. initiatives, although this extreme measure is not currently being considered. There are also accusations against the regents for allegedly planning to eliminate the school’s Go Blue Guarantee, which covers full tuition for low-income students from Michigan. However, the regents have stated that they actually aim to expand this program.
We are experiencing difficulty in accessing the content of the article.
To use this website properly, make sure to activate JavaScript in
We appreciate your understanding as we confirm your access. If you are using Reader mode, please close it and sign in to your Times account, or consider subscribing to access all of The Times content.
We appreciate your understanding as we confirm access.
Have you already signed up? Please log in.
Interested in accessing all of the content available on The Times? You
Prom
Index of the website
Navigation information for the website