Prom
Backed by
The University of Michigan is reviewing potential changes to its diversity program, which has been a strong advocate for diversity, equity, and inclusion in higher education. The school is exploring a different approach in response to criticisms about the program’s effectiveness and influence on campus culture.
Written by Nicholas Confessore
The University of Michigan, known for its strong support of diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives in higher education, is considering making adjustments to its own program. This comes as colleges nationwide prepare for the potential impact of Donald J. Trump’s second presidency and increased opposition from Republicans towards these initiatives in both government and academia.
University board members stated in interviews that they anticipate the board will propose restrictions on the use of diversity statements in the hiring and promotion process. There is also a possibility that the board will allocate a larger portion of Michigan’s diversity, equity, and inclusion budget towards recruitment initiatives and financial aid for students from low-income backgrounds.
Michigan is considering changes that would make it one of the first selective public universities to reassess diversity, equity, and inclusion (D.E.I.) without being pressured by legislation. The board, which is elected by state voters and mostly operates through agreement, has a majority of Democrats with a 6-2 ratio. The state constitution gives regents full control over the university’s finances and general supervision of the institution.
The next meeting of the regents is scheduled for December 5th. However, there has been strong opposition on the Michigan campus in response to initial conversations between the regents and university officials. Administrators focused on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (D.E.I.) have launched a campaign to defend their work and maintain their funding in the face of criticism.
A large group of supporters for diversity, equity, and inclusion met on the Ann Arbor campus for a rally on Monday.
One of the speakers, Pragya Choudhary, a junior, expressed that she believes no one in the audience thinks the D.E.I. initiatives at this university are flawless. However, she is confident that everyone present understands that without these initiatives, the university would be a less positive environment.
The discussions have highlighted a lack of clarity on campus about the purpose and goals of the D.E.I. program and the intentions of the regents. Some faculty and students are concerned that the regents may completely remove funding for the school’s D.E.I. initiatives, but this drastic action does not seem to be on the table. There are also accusations that the regents are considering cutting the Go Blue Guarantee, which covers full tuition for low-income students from Michigan. However, the regents have stated that they actually want to expand this program.
We are facing difficulties in accessing the content of the article.
Make sure to activate JavaScript in the settings of your web browser
We appreciate your patience as we confirm your access. If you are currently in Reader mode, please exit and sign in to your Times account or subscribe to access all of The Times content.
We appreciate your understanding as we confirm access.
Are you currently a member? Please sign in.
Interested in receiving all of The Times content? Subscribe today.
Prom
Index of the website
Navigation for site information.
