Prom
Backed by
The University of Michigan is reevaluating its diversity program, which has been a major advocate for diversity, equity, and inclusion in higher education. Critics are raising concerns about the program’s effectiveness and its influence on campus culture.
Written by Nicholas Confessore
The University of Michigan, known for its commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion, is considering making changes to its program in response to potential challenges from the upcoming second presidency of Donald J. Trump and the Republican party’s efforts to undermine diversity initiatives in both government and academia.
The board members in charge of the university stated that they anticipate proposing restrictions on diversity statements used in hiring and promotions. Additionally, they may consider reallocating some of Michigan’s D.E.I. budget towards recruitment initiatives and tuition assistance for students from lower-income backgrounds.
The proposed changes would position Michigan as one of the pioneering selective public universities to reassess Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (D.E.I.) without external pressure. The board of regents, elected by state voters, is primarily composed of Democrats with a 6-2 majority and typically makes decisions through agreement. According to Michigan’s state constitution, the regents have the final authority over the university’s finances and overall supervision of the institution.
The next meeting of the regents is scheduled for December 5th. However, recent conversations between the regents and university officials have faced strong opposition on Michigan’s campus. Administrators focused on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (D.E.I.) have launched a campaign to address criticisms of their efforts and safeguard their funding.
A large group of supporters for diversity, equity, and inclusion (D.E.I.) came together on the Ann Arbor campus for a rally on Monday.
One of the speakers, junior Pragya Choudhary, expressed that she believes no one in the audience thinks the Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (D.E.I.) initiatives at the university are flawless. However, she also stated that she is confident everyone present understands that without these initiatives, the university would be a poorer environment.
The discussions have highlighted a general lack of understanding on campus regarding the purpose of the D.E.I. program and the goals of the regents. Certain faculty and students are concerned that the regents may completely cut funding for the school’s D.E.I. initiatives, although this extreme measure does not seem to be on the table. There are also criticisms towards the regents for allegedly planning to eliminate the school’s Go Blue Guarantee, which covers full tuition for lower-income students from Michigan. However, the regents have stated that they actually aim to expand this program.
We are experiencing difficulties in accessing the content of the article.
To use this website properly, make sure that JavaScript is enabled
We appreciate your understanding as we confirm your access. If you are currently in Reader mode, please log out and sign into your Times account, or consider subscribing to access all of The Times content.
We appreciate your understanding as we confirm your access.
Are you currently a member? Please sign in.
Interested in accessing all of The Times’ content? Subscribe now.
Prom
Index of the Website
Navigational Information of the