Prom
Backed by
The University of Michigan is currently evaluating potential changes to its diversity program, which has been a major advocate for diversity, equity, and inclusion in higher education. Critics are raising concerns about the program’s effectiveness and influence on campus culture, prompting the school to explore new strategies.
Written by Nicholas Confessore
The University of Michigan, known for its strong support of diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives in higher education, is considering making changes to its own program. This decision comes as colleges nationwide prepare for the start of Donald J. Trump’s second presidency and potential challenges to these initiatives from Republican leaders in government and academia.
Officials in charge of the university mentioned that they anticipate the board will propose restrictions on diversity statements used in hiring and promotions. Additionally, there may be a plan to allocate a larger portion of Michigan’s D.E.I. budget towards recruitment initiatives and tuition assistance for students from lower-income backgrounds.
The proposed changes would position Michigan as one of the early public universities to review Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (D.E.I.) internally, rather than due to external legislative pressure. The board, predominantly comprised of Democrats with a 6-2 majority, is elected by state voters and typically makes decisions through consensus. According to Michigan’s state constitution, the regents have the final say on the university’s finances and are responsible for overseeing the school.
The next meeting of the regents is scheduled for December 5. However, recent conversations between the regents and university officials have faced strong opposition on the Michigan campus. Administrators in charge of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (D.E.I.) have launched a campaign to defend their work and secure their funding.
A rally took place on the Ann Arbor campus on Monday, where hundreds of supporters of diversity, equity, and inclusion gathered.
One of the speakers, Pragya Choudhary, a junior, expressed that she believes no one in the audience thinks the D.E.I. initiatives at the university are flawless. However, she emphasized that everyone present understands that without these initiatives, the university would be a less welcoming place.
The discussions have highlighted a general lack of clarity on campus regarding the purpose of the D.E.I. program and the goals of the regents. Some faculty and students are concerned that the regents may completely cut funding for the school’s D.E.I. initiatives, although this extreme measure is not currently being considered. There have also been criticisms of the regents for allegedly planning to eliminate the school’s Go Blue Guarantee, which covers full tuition for lower-income students from Michigan. However, the regents have stated that they actually want to expand this program.
We are experiencing difficulties in accessing the content of the article.
To use this website properly, make sure to activate JavaScript in
We appreciate your understanding as we confirm your access. If you are currently in Reader mode, please log out and sign in to your Times account, or consider subscribing to access all of The Times content.
We appreciate your understanding as we confirm access.
Are you already a member? Please sign in.
Interested in accessing all the content available on The Times? Consider subscribing
Prom
Index of the website
Navigation information for the website