Prom
Backed by
The University of Michigan is exploring potential modifications to its diversity program, which has been widely recognized as a strong advocate for diversity, equity, and inclusion in higher education. In light of criticism surrounding the program’s effectiveness and influence on campus culture, the school is contemplating a fresh perspective on how to approach diversity initiatives.
Written by Nicholas Confessore.
The University of Michigan, known for its commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion, is considering making adjustments to its program in response to potential challenges from the upcoming second term of President Donald J. Trump and the Republican opposition to such initiatives in both government and academia.
Members of the university’s governing body expressed their intention to propose restrictions on the use of diversity statements in the hiring and promotion processes. Additionally, they are considering reallocating a portion of the university’s diversity, equity, and inclusion budget towards recruitment efforts and financial assistance for students from low-income backgrounds.
Michigan is considering changes that would make it one of the first selective public universities to review diversity, equity, and inclusion (D.E.I) practices internally, rather than due to external pressure. The board overseeing the university has a majority of Democrats and is elected by state voters. They typically make decisions through agreement. The state constitution gives the board, known as regents, authority over the university’s finances and overall management of the school.
The next meeting of the regents is scheduled for December 5th. However, discussions between the regents and university officials have faced strong opposition on Michigan’s campus recently. Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (D.E.I.) administrators are actively responding to criticism of their work and working to maintain their funding.
A rally took place on the Ann Arbor campus on Monday, where hundreds of supporters of diversity, equity, and inclusion came together.
One of the speakers, Pragya Choudhary, a junior, expressed that she believes no one in the audience thinks the D.E.I. initiatives at the university are flawless. However, she emphasized that everyone present understands that without these initiatives, the university would be in a worse condition.
The discussions have highlighted a general lack of clarity on campus regarding the purpose of the D.E.I. program and the goals of the regents. A few faculty members and students have expressed concerns that the regents might completely withdraw funding for the school’s D.E.I. initiatives, although this extreme measure does not seem to be on the table. Some individuals have criticized the regents for allegedly considering cutting the Go Blue Guarantee, a program that covers full tuition for economically disadvantaged students from Michigan. However, the regents have stated that their intention is actually to enhance and broaden the program.
We are currently experiencing difficulties in accessing the content of the article.
To use this website, make sure to turn on JavaScript in
We appreciate your understanding as we confirm your access. If you are currently using Reader mode, please log out and sign in to your Times account, or consider subscribing to access all of The Times content.
We appreciate your understanding as we confirm your access.
Are you already a member? Sign in.
Interested in access to all content from The Times? Consider subscribing today
Prom
Index of the website
Navigation for site information
