Prom
Backed by
The University of Michigan is reviewing potential adjustments to its diversity program, which has been a major proponent of diversity, equity, and inclusion in higher education. Critics are raising concerns about the program’s effectiveness and its effects on campus culture.
Written by Nicholas Confessore
The University of Michigan, known for its strong support of diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives in higher education, is considering making changes to its own program. This comes as colleges nationwide prepare for Donald J. Trump’s second presidency and potential challenges from Republicans to these initiatives in both government and academia.
Members of the board in charge of the university mentioned in discussions that they anticipate the board will propose restrictions on diversity statements when making decisions about hiring and promotions. Additionally, the board may consider reallocating a portion of Michigan’s D.E.I. budget towards recruitment initiatives and tuition assistance for students from lower-income backgrounds.
The proposed changes in Michigan aim to address diversity, equity, and inclusion (D.E.I.) within the university without being influenced by external legislative pressure. The majority of the board members are Democrats, who are elected by state voters and usually make decisions through agreement. According to Michigan’s state constitution, the regents have the final say in the university’s finances and overall management of the institution.
The next meeting of the regents is scheduled for December 5th. However, there has been strong opposition on the Michigan campus in response to initial talks between the regents and university officials. Administrators focused on diversity, equity, and inclusion (D.E.I.) are actively defending their work and seeking to maintain their funding.
A rally took place on the Ann Arbor campus on Monday, where hundreds of supporters of diversity, equity, and inclusion (D.E.I.) came together.
During the event, a junior named Pragya Choudhary acknowledged that there is room for improvement in the diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives at the university. However, she emphasized that everyone in the audience recognizes the importance of these initiatives in making the university a better place.
Discussions on campus have highlighted a general lack of understanding about the purpose of the D.E.I. program and the intentions of the regents. Some faculty and students are concerned that the regents may completely cut funding for the school’s D.E.I. initiatives, but this extreme measure does not seem to be on the table. There have also been accusations that the regents plan to eliminate the school’s Go Blue Guarantee, which covers full tuition for lower-income students from Michigan. However, the regents have actually expressed a desire to expand this program.
We are experiencing difficulties in accessing the content of the article.
Kindly activate JavaScript in your browser’s settings.
We appreciate your understanding as we confirm your access. If you are currently in Reader mode, please log out and sign in to your Times account, or consider subscribing to access all of The Times’ content.
We appreciate your patience as we confirm your access.
Are you already a member? Sign in.
Interested in receiving all of the content from The Times? Sign up
Prom
Index of the website
Navigation for site information