Prom
Backed by
The University of Michigan is considering making changes to its diversity program, which is known for being a strong advocate for diversity, equity, and inclusion in higher education. Critics are questioning the program’s effectiveness and its impact on campus life, prompting the school to explore new approaches.
Authored by Nicholas Confessore
The University of Michigan, known for its strong support of diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives in higher education, is considering making changes to its own program. This comes as colleges nationwide prepare for Donald J. Trump’s second presidency and potential challenges to these initiatives from the Republican Party in both government and academia.
Members of the university’s governing body mentioned in discussions that they anticipate the board to propose restrictions on diversity statements in the hiring and promotion process. Additionally, the board is considering reallocating a portion of Michigan’s diversity, equity, and inclusion budget towards recruitment initiatives and financial assistance for students from lower-income backgrounds.
Michigan is considering changes that would make it one of the first selective public universities to review diversity, equity, and inclusion (D.E.I.) practices internally, rather than in response to legislative pressure. The board, which is elected by state voters and typically makes decisions through agreement, is primarily made up of Democrats with a 6-2 majority. The state constitution grants the regents authority over the university’s finances and general supervision of the school.
The next meeting of the regents is scheduled for December 5th. However, there has been strong opposition on Michigan’s campus in response to initial conversations between the regents and university officials. Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (D.E.I.) administrators are actively defending their work and advocating to maintain their funding amidst criticism.
Hundreds of supporters of diversity, equity, and inclusion (D.E.I.) came together on the campus of Ann Arbor on Monday for a rally.
One of the speakers, a junior named Pragya Choudhary, acknowledged that the D.E.I. initiatives at the university are not flawless in the eyes of the audience. However, she emphasized that everyone present understands that the university would be in a worse state without these initiatives.
The discussions have highlighted a general lack of clarity on campus regarding the purpose of the D.E.I. program and the intentions of the regents. Some faculty and students have expressed concerns that the regents may completely cut funding for the school’s D.E.I. initiatives, although this drastic measure is not currently being considered. There have also been criticisms of the regents for allegedly planning to eliminate the school’s Go Blue Guarantee, which covers full tuition for lower-income students from Michigan. However, the regents have stated that they actually aim to expand this program.
We are currently experiencing difficulties in accessing the information of the article.
To utilize the full functionality of this website, make sure to
We appreciate your patience as we check your access. If you are currently in Reader mode, please log out and sign in to your Times account or consider subscribing to access all of The Times.
We appreciate your understanding as we confirm access.
Have you already signed up for a subscription? Please log in
Interested in accessing all of The Times’ content? Sign up for
Prom
Index of Pages
Navigating Site Information