Prom
Backed by
The University of Michigan is currently reviewing its diversity program, which is known for being a strong advocate of diversity, equity, and inclusion in higher education. Some critics are questioning the effectiveness of the program and its influence on campus culture, prompting the school to explore potential changes.
Written by Nicholas Confessore
The University of Michigan, known for its commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion in higher education, is considering making changes to its program. This comes as colleges nationwide prepare for Donald J. Trump’s second presidency and potential challenges to these initiatives from Republicans in government and academia.
Officials in charge of the university mentioned in interviews that they anticipate the board will propose restrictions on diversity statements when making hiring and promotion choices. Additionally, the board might consider reallocating a portion of Michigan’s D.E.I. budget towards recruitment initiatives and tuition assistance for students from lower-income backgrounds.
The proposed changes in Michigan would position it as one of the pioneering selective public universities to reassess Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (D.E.I.) internally, rather than due to external legislative pressure. The board, which is elected by state voters and primarily operates through consensus, is currently dominated by Democrats with a 6-2 majority. According to Michigan’s state constitution, the regents have the final authority over the university’s finances and provide general supervision of the institution.
The next meeting of the regents is scheduled for December 5. However, talks between the regents and other university officials have faced strong opposition on Michigan’s campus lately. Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion administrators are actively defending their work and advocating for continued funding.
A large group of supporters for diversity, equity, and inclusion (D.E.I.) came together on the Ann Arbor campus for a rally on Monday.
One of the speakers, a junior named Pragya Choudhary, mentioned that while the D.E.I. initiatives at the university may not be flawless, it is widely acknowledged by everyone in the audience that the university would be in a worse state without them.
The discussions on campus have highlighted a general lack of clarity regarding the goals and actions of the D.E.I. program and the intentions of the regents. Some faculty and students have expressed concerns that the regents may completely cut funding for the school’s D.E.I. initiatives, although this drastic measure does not seem to be on the table. There have also been accusations that the regents are planning to eliminate the Go Blue Guarantee, a program that covers full tuition for low-income students from Michigan. However, the regents have actually stated that they aim to enhance and broaden the program.
We are experiencing difficulties in accessing the content of the article.
To utilize all features, please activate JavaScript in your browser preferences
We appreciate your understanding as we confirm your access. If you are currently using Reader mode, please log out and sign in to your Times account, or consider subscribing to access all of The Times.
We appreciate your understanding as we confirm access.
Are you currently a member? Sign in to access your account
Interested in having access to all content from The Times? Subscribe now
Prom
Index of the Website
Navigation information for the Website
