Prom
Backed by
The University of Michigan is contemplating changes to its diversity program, which has been a major advocate for diversity, equity, and inclusion in higher education. Critics are raising concerns about the program’s effectiveness and its influence on campus culture.
Written by Nicholas Confessore
The University of Michigan, known for its commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion in higher education, is considering making changes to its program in response to potential threats to these initiatives under the upcoming second term of President Donald J. Trump and the Republican administration. Colleges nationwide are preparing for challenges to diversity efforts in both government and academia.
Members of the university’s governing body expressed their intention to propose restrictions on the use of diversity statements in the hiring and promotion processes. Additionally, they may consider reallocating a portion of the institution’s diversity, equity, and inclusion budget towards initiatives aimed at recruiting students from underprivileged backgrounds and providing tuition support for them.
Michigan is considering changes that would make it one of the first public universities to reassess Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (D.E.I.) without being forced by laws. The board overseeing the university has a majority of Democrats and is chosen by voters in the state, typically making decisions based on agreement among members. The state constitution gives the board of regents the final say on the university’s finances and overall management of the school.
The next meeting of the regents is scheduled for December 5th. However, recent conversations between the regents and other university officials have faced strong opposition on the campus of Michigan. Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (D.E.I.) administrators are working to defend their work and secure their funding in response to criticism.
Hundreds of supporters of diversity, equity, and inclusion (D.E.I.) came together on the Ann Arbor campus for a rally on Monday.
During a speech at the university, junior Pragya Choudhary acknowledged that the D.E.I. initiatives could be improved. However, she emphasized that everyone in the audience recognized the importance of these initiatives in making the university a better place.
The discussions have highlighted a general lack of clarity on campus about the purpose of the D.E.I. program and the intentions of the regents. Some faculty and students are concerned that the regents may completely withdraw funding for the school’s D.E.I. initiatives, but this drastic measure does not seem to be on the table. There are also accusations against the regents for allegedly considering cutting the school’s Go Blue Guarantee, which covers full tuition for low-income students from Michigan. However, the regents have stated that they actually aim to increase support for this program.
We are experiencing difficulties in accessing the content of the article.
Kindly activate JavaScript within your browser’s settings.
We appreciate your patience as we confirm your access. If you are currently in Reader mode, please log out and sign in to your Times account, or consider subscribing to access all of The Times content.
We appreciate your patience as we confirm access.
Are you already a member? Please sign in.
Interested in accessing all content from The Times? Consider subscribing today.
Prom
Index of Pages
Navigation for Site Information