Prom
Backed by
The University of Michigan is reviewing potential changes to its diversity program, which has been a prominent supporter of diversity, equity, and inclusion in higher education. Critics have raised concerns about the program’s effectiveness and its influence on campus culture.
Authored by Nicholas Confessore
The University of Michigan is considering changes to its diversity, equity, and inclusion programs in response to the upcoming second term of President Donald J. Trump and potential challenges to these initiatives from Republicans in government and academia. The university has a strong commitment to promoting diversity in higher education.
Members of the board in charge of the university mentioned in interviews that they anticipate the board will propose restrictions on diversity statements in the hiring and promotion process. Additionally, they may consider reallocating a portion of Michigan’s diversity, equity, and inclusion budget towards recruitment initiatives and tuition assistance for students from lower-income backgrounds.
The proposed changes in Michigan aim to reevaluate Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (D.E.I.) at the university, making it one of the first selective public universities to do so without external pressure. The board overseeing the university is mainly comprised of Democrats, who are elected by state voters and typically make decisions through agreement. The state constitution grants the regents authority over the university’s finances and overall supervision of the institution.
The next meeting of the regents is scheduled for December 5th. However, recent conversations between the regents and other university officials have caused strong opposition on Michigan’s campus. Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion administrators are actively defending their work and working to secure their funding.
A large group of supporters of diversity, equity, and inclusion met on the Ann Arbor campus for a rally on Monday.
One of the speakers, a junior named Pragya Choudhary, expressed that she believes no one in the audience thinks the D.E.I. initiatives at the university are flawless. However, she emphasized that everyone present understands that without these initiatives, the university would be in a worse state.
The discussions have highlighted a general lack of understanding on campus about the purpose of the D.E.I. program and the intentions of the regents. Certain faculty and students are concerned that the regents may completely cut funding for the school’s D.E.I. initiatives, although this drastic measure does not seem to be on the table. There are also accusations that the regents are planning to eliminate the school’s Go Blue Guarantee, which covers full tuition for low-income students from Michigan. However, the regents have stated that they actually want to broaden the program.
We are experiencing difficulties in accessing the content of the article.
To use this website properly, make sure to activate JavaScript in
We appreciate your understanding as we confirm your access. If you are currently using Reader mode, please close it and sign in to your Times account, or consider subscribing to access all of The Times’ content.
We appreciate your understanding as we confirm access.
Are you currently a member? Please sign in.
Interested in receiving all of The Times? Sign up for a subscription
Prom
Index of Pages
Navigation for Site Information